Project updates, practice news, and the occasional hot take. You might just find the spark you’re looking for.
For something that causes so much anxiety, planning committees are surprisingly misunderstood.
They’re often imagined as a room full of people waiting to tear a proposal apart, or as an unpredictable hurdle that appears at the very end of the process just to make life difficult. If your project is going to committee, it can feel like everything suddenly gets serious.
At its most basic level, a planning committee is a group of elected councillors who decide certain planning applications on behalf of the local authority. Most applications never go anywhere near them — they’re dealt with under delegated powers by planning officers and quietly approved (or refused) without any public debate at all.
Committee is reserved for the ones that need a bit more scrutiny.
Why do some applications go to committee?
That could be because the proposal is large, sensitive, controversial, or simply because it’s been “called in” by a councillor following objections from the public. It doesn’t automatically mean something has gone wrong, or that officers don’t support it.
In fact, many schemes that go to committee are recommended for approval.
Who actually makes the decision?
One of the most important things to understand is that the committee isn’t there to redesign your project. They’re not judging taste, and they’re not deciding whether they personally like it. Their job is to weigh the planning merits of a proposal, based on policy, material considerations, and the officer’s report in front of them.
That report matters a lot.
Before a scheme reaches committee, planning officers will have already assessed it in detail. They’ll set out the background, summarise consultation responses, consider policy compliance, and make a recommendation. Committee members are expected to give that professional advice significant weight, even if they ultimately disagree with it.
Which brings us to an important point: committees are human.
Councillors aren’t planners by training. They bring local knowledge, political awareness and community perspective to the table, which is exactly why the system works the way it does. But it also means decisions are influenced by how clearly a proposal is explained and how well the planning balance is set out.
That’s why preparation matters.
What can a planning committee consider — and what can’t it?
A good committee presentation doesn’t try to oversell a scheme or bury it in technical language. It explains what’s being proposed, why it works in planning terms, and how concerns have been addressed. It’s about clarity, not persuasion.
It’s also worth knowing what a committee can’t do.
They can’t refuse a scheme purely because of local opposition if the planning merits stack up. They can’t ignore policy. And they can’t make decisions based on things that aren’t material planning considerations, no matter how passionately they’re raised.
When committees do refuse schemes against officer advice, those decisions often end up being scrutinised on appeal — and sometimes overturned.
Is going to committee a bad sign?
For applicants, the experience itself is usually less dramatic than expected. Meetings are formal, but procedural. Speakers are time-limited. Questions are asked. A vote is taken. And then it’s done.
No theatrics. No interrogation.
The key thing to remember is this: going to committee doesn’t mean your project is on trial.
It means it needs to be considered in the open, with a clear explanation of how it fits within planning policy and the local context. When that’s handled properly, committees are often far more predictable than their reputation suggests.
Are planning committees changing?
Planning committees aren’t static, and there’s ongoing discussion about how they operate.
Recent proposals have focused on improving consistency, training for committee members, and clearer rules around which applications go to committee and which don’t. There’s also increasing recognition that well-resourced planning departments — particularly experienced planning officers — are essential for the system to function properly.
Whatever changes come, the core role of committees remains the same: to make decisions on certain applications in the open, with elected members taking responsibility where officers can’t act alone.
Once you understand that, committees become a lot less intimidating — and a lot easier to prepare for.
Planning Committee FAQ's
Do all planning applications go to committee?
No. Most planning applications are decided by planning officers under delegated powers. Only a small proportion ever reach committee.
Why has my application been referred to committee?
Usually because it’s larger, more sensitive, publicly contentious, or has been called in by a councillor. It doesn’t automatically mean officers are against it.
Can a planning committee refuse something officers recommend for approval?
Yes, but they must give clear planning reasons. Decisions that go against officer advice are often closely scrutinised and may be appealed.
Can objectors stop a scheme at committee?
Objections are considered, but they must be based on material planning matters. Volume of opposition alone isn’t a reason for refusal.
Is a planning committee decision final?
Not always. If an application is refused, there may be the option to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate.
